PP 37: Infringement on LGBTQ Rights as a Result of the Judicial Changes

Summary

The Israeli Law Professors’ Forum for Democracy, an ad hoc and voluntary group of experts on Israeli law and specifically Israeli public law, expresses its grave concern over the apparent intention to abolish the independence of the judiciary, to subordinate it to the government and to the partisan political considerations of the executive branch, to undermine the independent status of the attorney general and civil service legal counsels, and to violate human rights. In this paper we address the expected harm to the rights of LGBTQ persons, resulting from the composition of the government and the appointments it has made, from the coalition agreements, from bills proposed by members of the coalition, and from the actions and statements made by the Government and its members. We conclude that the combined actions, obligations and legislative changes, undertaken by the government and the coalition is likely to cause grave harm to the rights of all LGBTQ persons in Israel and their families. In addition they carry real potential to harm the rights of heterosexual persons in Israel, and to cause an extremely severe regression in the rights of the LGBTQ community in Israel.

Key Points:

● The combined actions, obligations and legislative changes undertaken by the government and coalition may cause a fatal damage to the rights of all LGBTQ persons in Israel and their families. In addition they carry real potential to harm the rights of heterosexual persons in Israel, and to cause an extremely severe regression in the rights of the LGBTQ community in Israel.

● The legislative changes contemplated by the coalition, to allow discrimination on religious grounds of LGBTQ persons, may, if adopted, eliminate the legal protections for the rights of LGBTQ persons to equality and liberty in the public sphere; impair their autonomy; and impair their freedom from discrimination and from violation of human dignity in all areas of life: at home, in the public sphere, in commerce and consumerism, in leisure activities and more.

● The legislative change that would permit discrimination on grounds of religion may allow any business owner to refuse LGBTQ persons access to the business, either as clients or as employees, for example in order to attract homophobic clientele.

● The weakening of the Supreme Court through politicization of the appointment of judges and through annulment of effective judicial review may harm LGBTQ. Families, parental autonomy, the right to parenthood of LGBTQ persons and the rights of their children may be adversely affected, since the legal recognition of LGBTQ families in Israel is grounded almost entirely in judicial decisions.

● The weakening of judicial independence may cause grave harm especially to the rights of persons on the transgender spectrum, since the rights of these persons in core issues such as autonomy, legal recognition, parenthood, employment, health, discrimination in services and products and access to public spaces have been recognized and protected almost entirely by judicial decision.

● Expansion of the rabbinical courts’ jurisdiction is likely to cause harm to parents going through divorce following their coming out. It will also harm their children, since it will expand the reach of the law applied in rabbinical courts to additional families.

● The weakening of the Supreme Court’s authority to block discriminatory legislation and offer remedy to minority groups will cause particular harm to the rights of LGBTQ persons. In addition, the government’s intention to limit the activities of human rights organizations will harm the activity of civil society, which has always been an indispensable component in the campaign for equal rights for LGBTQ persons.

● The Prime Minister’s claim in his speech of 23 March 2023 that LGBTQ persons’ rights will not be harmed is a lie. The government's plans, and first amongst them the political takeover of the procedures for the selection of judges, will harm the rights of LGBTQ persons.

LGTBQ Position Paper final copy

.pdf

הורידו את PDF • 212KB

PP 58: The Judiciary and the Protection of Asylum Seekers’ Rights in Israel

Published October 1st 2023

The Israeli Law Professors’ Forum for Democracy responds in this position paper to recent public criticism of the Supreme Court's alleged policy regarding asylum seekers living in Israel.

We show that:

· In practice, the Supreme Court has not intervened in the state’s immigration policy, and its ruling regarding asylum seekers was restricted to extreme cases of severe and disproportionate infringements upon basic human rights, rights which accrue not only to citizens but to all persons.

· The Supreme Court has limited its judicial review mainly to cases in which prolonged and sweeping deprivations of liberty were imposed on persons whom the state itself recognized as people who cannot be deported from Israel. The Court refrained from promoting an alternative policy to that of the legislature and government regarding the proper treatment of asylum seekers, leaving government authorities significant leeway to implement their policies.

Highlights of the position paper:

Following the violent altercations that took place among Eritrean asylum seekers on September 2, 2023, many members of the government and its supporters chose to blame the judgments and decisions of the Supreme Court for these events. Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and other ministers claimed that the presence of "infiltrators" in Israel specifically in southern Tel Aviv results from the Court's intervention in laws that allowed for the detention of asylum seekers for long periods and in arrangements designed to allow their removal to a third country.

These claims are inaccurate. They reflect a disregard for the rules of international law that bind the state and appear to constitute an attempt by the government to attribute to the Court the failure of its own policy in dealing with Eritrean asylum seekers, most of whom have been present in Israel for some fifteen years.

This position paper presents five interrelated arguments, to provide an accurate account of the Supreme Court's policy concerning asylum seekers living in Israel:

A. We examine and reject the argument that the continued presence of asylum seekers in Israel is a direct result of the Supreme Court's intervention in the policy regarding their incarceration.

B. We examine and reject the claim that the Supreme Court has prevented the government from deporting asylum seekers, demonstrating that in practice, the Court has principally approved the policy of deporting asylum seekers to a third country.

C. We examine and reject the claim that the Supreme Court has prevented the state from ascertaining which of the Eritrean asylum seekers are indeed refugees entitled to international protection and which are not, demonstrating that contrary to this claim, the Court has actually criticized the state for dragging its feet in reviewing asylum applications, on numerous occasions.

D. We examine and reject the claim that the Supreme Court has prevented the state from enforcing the law against asylum seekers who have committed criminal offenses. We show that the Court has in fact upheld the state’s use of exceptional measures that allow for the indefinite detention of asylum seekers "involved in crimes", whom have not been convicted or whom have completed their sentence while deviating from the regular procedural and evidentiary rules that apply to suspects and defendants.

E. We examine and reject the claim that the Supreme Court has intervened in the government's general policy regarding the reception of asylum seekers. On the contrary, the Court has upheld the policies concerning the denial of work permits and of basic social rights.

מס׳ 58 מבקשי מקלט ומערכת המשפט

.pdf

הורידו את PDF • 254KB

PP 55: Comments on the draft Firearms Regulations (Conditions and Criteria for a License)

Published 27 July, 2023

Summary

The Israeli Law Professors’ Forum for Democracy views with great concern the intent to expand considerably the number of people licensed to hold personal firearms, as indicated by the draft Firearms Regulations published for public comment on 11.7.2023.

· The Minister of National Security’s position, as expressed in several publications, is that the number of personal firearms in the civilian sphere should be increased by tens of thousands, in order, as he puts it, to increase the personal security of Israeli residents and citizens in the face of violence and terror. Based on verified data, however, we are gravely concerned that such a growth in the number of firearms will significantly increase the number of deaths by shooting (suicides, criminal acts in the domestic sphere, and escalation of violent events) and result in firearms falling into the hands of criminal elements. Particular attention must be drawn to the enormous risk this will pose to women in the domestic sphere.

· Before adopting any policy that will increase the number of personal firearms, a clear framework should be in place that will guarantee appropriate oversight and enforcement of the way in which licenses are granted and conformity with the conditions required for holding them. In the absence of such a framework, the professional literature makes clear that there is a significant risk that licensed firearms will be abused, that they will serve criminal purposes and fall into criminal hands, that they will be used to commit suicide, and that they will cause accidental deaths.

· The draft Regulations compromise standards of professional training, they include no provisions that guarantee careful use of firearms to prevent the firearms from being lost or falling into criminal hands, and they provide no plan to test the effects of the new policy in a scientific manner.

מס׳ 55 תקנות רישוי כלי יריה

.pdf

הורידו את PDF • 603KB